Mac App: VMWare Fusion

Just as I love Parallels Desktop, VMWare’s Mac offering is great too.  Parallels and VMWare come from two different perspectives-Parallels had nothing to lose and built it to use hardware features, while VMWare had years of work into virtual machines from the pre-hardware support era.  VMWare seems to be less efficient when in the background, but is more effecient when doing heavy workloads.  VMWare offers dual-monitor support, upto 4-cpu support, upto 16GB of memory, and sells for $79.99.

**UPDATE**–February 2, 2009 (2:15p)

As per a comment on this post by Peter Kazanjy, VMWare Fusion does support the same hardware features Parallels Desktop utilizes, however does not provide a means of accessing this from the user interface.  I will touch on this in a later post, but for the record both VMWare and Parallels have software support for and therefore will utilize the next generation of Intel’s hardware-assisted virtualization technology: this technology ships in the Corei7 processor and in future processors of the “Nahalam” microarchitecture.

  • http://blogs.vmware.com/teamfusion Peter Kazanjy

    Hi there Brad!

    Thanks for helping folks understand the value of virtualization.

    A quick point of clarification: VMware Fusion has had support for hardware-assisted virtualization since the 1.0 release.

    We don’t expose it in the UI, but the product can tell whether it is running on VT-enabled hardware, and take advantage of it.

    And this is also the case with second generation VT that will be shipping in Intel’s next generation chip microarchitecture (“Nehalam” or Corei7). Even though there are no Macs shipping yet that use chips with Nehalam architecture, when they do ship, Fusion 2 will already support it.

    Hope that helps.

    Pete Kazanjy
    VMware Product Product Marketing